Export limit exceeded: 11529 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11529 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-81534 | 2026-10-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| The Email Customizer for WooCommerce (Pro) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in versions up to, and including, 3.9.5. This is due to insufficient authorization and input sanitization in the send_test_mail() function, which allows user-controlled PHP code to be written to executable files in the uploads directory. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to execute arbitrary PHP code on the server, leading to full site compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110002 | 2026-10-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| The Snazzy Social Media Feed plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Arbitrary File Upload in all versions up to, and including, 2.5 via the (file scope) function. This is due to missing WordPress bootstrap, authentication, capability, and nonce checks in the standalone save-to-cache.php script, combined with insufficient sanitization of the pluginURL parameter before it is written to a web-executable PHP file. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to upload files that may be executable, which makes remote code execution possible. The save-to-cache.php script is directly reachable without loading WordPress; FILTER_SANITIZE_URL — the only filter applied to the pluginURL value — preserves the characters required to craft a valid PHP payload, which is then written verbatim into cached-content/cached-feed.php and immediately executable via a single GET request. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108587 | 2026-10-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| The 10Web Booster – Website speed optimization, Cache & Page Speed optimizer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Arbitrary File Upload in all versions up to, and including, 2.34.10 via the compressCustom function. This is due to missing file type validation and extension filtering on the page_id parameter, combined with a world-readable leaked nonce that bypasses authentication checks. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload files that may be executable, which makes remote code execution possible. This exploit chain requires obtaining the plugin's REST nonce (tenwebio_rest), which is automatically serialized to a world-readable file under wp-content/uploads/ whenever a bulk optimisation batch pauses; because the nonce is generated in a cron/loopback context with a user ID of 0, it is valid for unauthenticated visitors. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104800 | 2026-10-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| The AGE-GATE plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 1.0 via the 'width (and height)' parameter parameter. This is due to missing authentication, capability checks, and nonce verification on the standalone admin.php endpoint, combined with unsanitized injection of POST parameters directly into generated PHP source written to an included file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute code on the server. This is possible because admin.php does not load WordPress and carries no ABSPATH guard, making it a fully unauthenticated entry point regardless of the decorative capability arguments registered via the plugin's simulated menu API. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103529 | 1 Thelia | 1 Thelia | 2026-10-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| Thelia v2.6.0 permits authenticated administrators to upload and install modules via the ZIP upload function without validating or sandboxing embedded PHP code. An attacker can include malicious PHP code in a module's `install()` method which will then be executed upon installation, enabling remote code execution with the privileges of the web server. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100232 | 2026-10-15 | 7.2 High | ||
| Post-authentication Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability has been identified in the SonicWall Network Security Manager (NSM) on-prem which in specific conditions could potentially enable a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary OS commands, resulting in remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8512 | 1 Microsoft | 7 Office, Office Online Server, Office Web Apps and 4 more | 2026-10-15 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft Office when the software fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka "Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-8509, CVE-2017-8510, CVE-2017-8511, CVE-2017-0260, and CVE-2017-8506. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103535 | 1 Thelia | 1 Thelia | 2026-10-15 | 8.8 High |
| Thelia v2.6.1 contains path traversal and PHP code injection vulnerabilities in its translation editor that can be chained to achieve remote code execution. The `item_name` parameter, used to build the translation file's write path, does not sanitize directory traversal sequences such as `../`. This enables an authenticated user with `UPDATE`-level permissions on `admin.configuration.language` to write files outside the expected `templates/` directory, including to web‑accessible paths. Separately, the translation‑writing logic does not escape `\` in user‑supplied values, allowing inputs to break out of the PHP string literal and inject executable code into the translation file. Chained together, these flaws allow a malicious PHP file to be written to a web-accessible path and executed with the web‑server’s privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8509 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Office, Office Compatibility Pack, Office Web Apps and 5 more | 2026-10-15 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft Office when the software fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka "Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-8510, CVE-2017-8511, CVE-2017-8512, CVE-2017-0260, and CVE-2017-8506. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0281 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Office, Office Online Server, Office Web Apps and 5 more | 2026-10-15 | N/A |
| Microsoft Office 2007 SP3, Office 2010 SP2, Office 2013 SP1, Office 2016, Office Online Server 2016, Office Web Apps 2010 SP2,Office Web Apps 2013 SP1, Project Server 2013 SP1, SharePoint Enterprise Server 2013 SP1, SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016, SharePoint Foundation 2013 SP1, Sharepoint Server 2010 SP2, Word 2016, and Skype for Business 2016 allow a remote code execution vulnerability when the software fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka "Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-0261 and CVE-2017-0262. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6432 | 1 Silicon Labs | 1 Sisdk | 2026-10-15 | N/A |
| Improper bounds validation in the ZAP command parser of EmberZNet SDK versions 8.0.0 through 9.1.1 (inclusive) and before 7.5.2 (exclusive) may result in crashes or dynamic memory leakage. In order to exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would have to have the ability to send arbitrary messages on the network. The only known exploit of this vulnerability leaks a limited number of bytes from the stack. No denial-of-service, memory corruption, or remote code execution has been shown. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0322 | 2 Palo Alto Networks, Paloaltonetworks | 4 Cloud Ngfw, Pan-os, Prisma Access and 1 more | 2026-10-15 | 7.2 High |
| A remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability in the management interface of Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS® software enables an authenticated attacker with network access to execute arbitrary code with root privileges on the firewall. The security risk posed by this issue is minimized by restricting access to the management interface to only trusted internal IP addresses according to our recommended best practice deployment guidelines https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/community-blogs/tips-amp-tricks-how-to-secure-the-management-access-of-your-palo/ba-p/464431 . This issue is applicable to PAN-OS software on PA-Series and VM-Series firewalls and on Panorama (virtual and M-Series). Cloud NGFW and Prisma® Access are not impacted by this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93388 | 2026-10-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| The Printcart Store (PCDesigner / NB Designer) plugin for WooCommerce is vulnerable to unauthenticated arbitrary file upload leading to remote code execution in all versions up to, and including, 2.9.1 The nbdesigner_copy_image_from_url AJAX action is registered for logged-out callers (wp_ajax_nopriv_), and its Google Drive branch rebuilds the destination filename from the raw, attacker-supplied gapi[name] parameter — bypassing the jpg/jpeg/png/gif allow-list applied on the other branch — and writes the fetched bytes to a web-accessible directory (wp-content/uploads/nbdesigner/temp/). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to write a .php file to a web-served, PHP-executing location and, by supplying their own Google Drive file and OAuth token as the content source, execute arbitrary code on the server. The required save-design nonce is handed to anonymous callers by the nbd_check_use_logged_in endpoint, so it presents no barrier. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103994 | 2026-10-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| A Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in the VXLAN Gateway Daemon (vgd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows a malicious or compromised SDN-controller to cause a complete outage of the OVSDB control plane and possibly remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-109347 | 1 Adminer | 1 Adminer | 2026-10-15 | 7.2 High |
| Adminer before 6.1.1 contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows authenticated SQLite users to bypass ATTACH and VACUUM INTO restrictions by prefixing statements with a UTF-8 byte-order mark. Attackers can attach a database file at a PHP-served path and create a table named with PHP code to execute it as the web server user. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6409 | 1 Redhat | 4 Enterprise Linux, Openshift, Rhel E4s and 1 more | 2026-10-15 | 7 High |
| A race condition vulnerability was discovered in how signals are handled by OpenSSH's server (sshd). If a remote attacker does not authenticate within a set time period, then sshd's SIGALRM handler is called asynchronously. However, this signal handler calls various functions that are not async-signal-safe, for example, syslog(). As a consequence of a successful attack, in the worst case scenario, an attacker may be able to perform a remote code execution (RCE) as an unprivileged user running the sshd server. | ||||
| CVE-2023-38408 | 3 Fedoraproject, Openbsd, Redhat | 9 Fedora, Openssh, Devworkspace and 6 more | 2026-10-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| The PKCS#11 feature in ssh-agent in OpenSSH before 9.3p2 has an insufficiently trustworthy search path, leading to remote code execution if an agent is forwarded to an attacker-controlled system. (Code in /usr/lib is not necessarily safe for loading into ssh-agent.) NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2016-10009. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85439 | 2 Mit, Moos-ivp | 2 Moos-ivp, Moos-ivp | 2026-10-14 | 7.8 High |
| MOOS-IvP through 24.8.1 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in alogsplit's SplitHandler::handlePreCheckSplitDir() function that fails to sanitize shell metacharacters in log file pathnames. Attackers can embed shell syntax in log file names or the --dir parameter to execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the operator running alogsplit. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85437 | 2 Mit, Moos-ivp | 2 Moos-ivp, Moos-ivp | 2026-10-14 | 9.8 Critical |
| MOOS-IvP through 24.8.1 contains multiple buffer overflow vulnerabilities in IvP function string decoders that trust attacker-controlled length fields without validation. Attackers can craft malicious encoded strings with mismatched declared and actual field lengths to overflow heap and stack buffers, potentially achieving remote code execution through MOOS variables or alog files. | ||||
| CVE-2023-25136 | 4 Fedoraproject, Netapp, Openbsd and 1 more | 10 Fedora, 500f, 500f Firmware and 7 more | 2026-10-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| OpenSSH server (sshd) 9.1 introduced a double-free vulnerability during options.kex_algorithms handling. This is fixed in OpenSSH 9.2. The double free can be leveraged, by an unauthenticated remote attacker in the default configuration, to jump to any location in the sshd address space. One third-party report states "remote code execution is theoretically possible." | ||||