Export limit exceeded: 12570 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (12570 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-20207 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability in Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) polling for Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager, Cisco Secure Email Gateway, and Cisco Secure Web Appliance could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to obtain confidential information about the underlying operating system. This vulnerability exists because the appliances do not protect confidential information at rest in response to SNMP poll requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted SNMP poll request to the affected appliance. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to discover confidential information that should be restricted. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must have the configured SNMP credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8448 | 1 Schneider-electric | 2 Ecostruxure Building Operation Enterprise Server, Ecostruxure Workstation | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability exists that could cause unauthorized access to sensitive credential data when an attacker is able to capture local SMB traffic between a valid user within the BMS network and the vulnerable products. | ||||
| CVE-2023-52237 | 1 Siemens | 80 Ruggedcom I800, Ruggedcom I800nc, Ruggedcom I801 and 77 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM i800, RUGGEDCOM i800NC, RUGGEDCOM i801, RUGGEDCOM i801NC, RUGGEDCOM i802, RUGGEDCOM i802NC, RUGGEDCOM i803, RUGGEDCOM i803NC, RUGGEDCOM M2100, RUGGEDCOM M2100NC, RUGGEDCOM M2200, RUGGEDCOM M2200NC, RUGGEDCOM M969, RUGGEDCOM M969NC, RUGGEDCOM RMC30, RUGGEDCOM RMC30NC, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388NC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388NC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RP110, RUGGEDCOM RP110NC, RUGGEDCOM RS1600, RUGGEDCOM RS1600F, RUGGEDCOM RS1600FNC, RUGGEDCOM RS1600NC, RUGGEDCOM RS1600T, RUGGEDCOM RS1600TNC, RUGGEDCOM RS400, RUGGEDCOM RS400NC, RUGGEDCOM RS401, RUGGEDCOM RS401NC, RUGGEDCOM RS416, RUGGEDCOM RS416NC, RUGGEDCOM RS416NCv2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416NCv2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416P, RUGGEDCOM RS416PNC, RUGGEDCOM RS416PNCv2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416PNCv2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS8000, RUGGEDCOM RS8000A, RUGGEDCOM RS8000ANC, RUGGEDCOM RS8000H, RUGGEDCOM RS8000HNC, RUGGEDCOM RS8000NC, RUGGEDCOM RS8000T, RUGGEDCOM RS8000TNC, RUGGEDCOM RS900, RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900G, RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900GNC, RUGGEDCOM RS900GNC(32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900GNC(32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900GP, RUGGEDCOM RS900GPNC, RUGGEDCOM RS900L, RUGGEDCOM RS900LNC, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-GETS-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-GETS-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-STND-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-STND-XX-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900NC, RUGGEDCOM RS900NC(32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900NC(32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900W, RUGGEDCOM RS910, RUGGEDCOM RS910L, RUGGEDCOM RS910LNC, RUGGEDCOM RS910NC, RUGGEDCOM RS910W, RUGGEDCOM RS920L, RUGGEDCOM RS920LNC, RUGGEDCOM RS920W, RUGGEDCOM RS930L, RUGGEDCOM RS930LNC, RUGGEDCOM RS930W, RUGGEDCOM RS940G, RUGGEDCOM RS940GNC, RUGGEDCOM RS969, RUGGEDCOM RS969NC, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100NC, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100NC(32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100NC(32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PNC, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PNC (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PNC (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200NC, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288NC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288NC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300NC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300NC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300PNC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300PNC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488NC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488NC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG907R, RUGGEDCOM RSG908C, RUGGEDCOM RSG909R, RUGGEDCOM RSG910C, RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG920PNC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG920PNC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSL910, RUGGEDCOM RSL910NC, RUGGEDCOM RST2228, RUGGEDCOM RST2228P, RUGGEDCOM RST916C, RUGGEDCOM RST916P. The web server of the affected devices allow a low privileged user to access hashes and password salts of all system's users, including admin users. An attacker could use the obtained information to brute force the passwords offline. | ||||
| CVE-2023-52238 | 1 Siemens | 2 Ruggedcom Rst2228, Ruggedcom Rst2228p | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM RST2228 (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RST2228P (All versions < V5.9.0). The web server of the affected systems leaks the MACSEC key in clear text to a logged in user. An attacker with the credentials of a low privileged user could retrieve the MACSEC key and access (decrypt) the ethernet frames sent by authorized recipients. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8304 | 2 Checkpoint, Microsoft | 2 Identity Agent, Windows | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| An authenticated local user can obtain information that allows claiming security policy rules of another user due to sensitive information being accessible in the Windows Registry keys for Check Point Identity Agent running on a Terminal Server. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14197 | 1 Verysync | 1 Verysync | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| A security vulnerability has been detected in Verysync 微力同步 up to 2.21.3. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /rest/f/api/resources/f96956469e7be39d of the component Web Administration Module. Such manipulation leads to information disclosure. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2023-5692 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| WordPress Core is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in versions up to, and including, 6.4.3 via the redirect_guess_404_permalink function. This can allow unauthenticated attackers to expose the slug of a custom post whose 'publicly_queryable' post status has been set to 'false'. | ||||
| CVE-2025-11406 | 1 Kaifangqian | 1 Kaifangqian | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| A security flaw has been discovered in kaifangqian kaifangqian-base up to 7b3faecda13848b3ced6c17c7423b76c5b47b8ab. This issue affects the function getAllUsers of the file kaifangqian-parent/kaifangqian-system/src/main/java/com/kaifangqian/modules/system/controller/SysUserController.java. The manipulation results in information disclosure. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. | ||||
| CVE-2020-13481 | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| Certain Lexmark products through 2020-05-25 allow XSS which allows an attacker to obtain session credentials and other sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2023-7046 | 2 Gowebsmarty, Wordpress | 2 Wp-encryption, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| The WP Encryption – One Click Free SSL Certificate & SSL / HTTPS Redirect to Force HTTPS, SSL Score plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 7.0 via exposed Private key files. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including TLS Certificate Private Keys | ||||
| CVE-2024-0615 | 2 Codeatlantic, Wordpress | 2 Content Control, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Content Control – The Ultimate Content Restriction Plugin! Restrict Content, Create Conditional Blocks & More plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.0 via the API. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract post titles, IDs, slugs, statuses and other information including post content. This includes published content only. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12149 | 1 Search-guard | 1 Search Guard | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| In Search Guard FLX versions 3.1.2 and earlier, while Document-Level Security (DLS) is correctly enforced elsewhere, when the search is triggered from a Signals watch, the DLS rule is not enforced, allowing access to all documents in the queried indices. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12148 | 1 Search-guard | 1 Search Guard | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| In Search Guard versions 3.1.1 and earlier, Field Masking (FM) rules are improperly enforced on fields of type IP (IP Address). While the content of these fields is properly redacted in the _source document returned by search operations, the results do return documents (hits) when searching based on a specific IP values. This allows to reconstruct the original contents of the field. Workaround - If you cannot upgrade immediately, you can avoid the problem by using field level security (FLS) protection on fields of the affected types instead of field masking. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12147 | 1 Search-guard | 1 Search Guard | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| In Search Guard FLX versions 3.1.1 and earlier, Field-Level Security (FLS) rules are improperly enforced on object-valued fields. When an FLS exclusion rule (e.g., ~field) is applied to a field which contains an object as its value, the object is correctly removed from the _source returned by search operations. However, the object members (i.e., child attributes) remain accessible to search queries. This exposure allows adversaries to infer or reconstruct the original contents of the excluded object. Workaround - If you cannot upgrade immediately and FLS exclusion rules are used for object valued attributes (like ~object), add an additional exclusion rule for the members of the object (like ~object.*). | ||||
| CVE-2024-11008 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Members – Membership & User Role Editor Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.10 via the WordPress core search feature. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data from posts that have been restricted to higher-level roles such as administrator. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12074 | 2 Postmagthemes, Wordpress | 2 Context Blog, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Context Blog theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.5 via the 'context_blog_modal_popup' due to insufficient restrictions on which posts can be included. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract data from password protected, private, or draft posts that they should not have access to. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11994 | 1 Elastic | 1 Apm Server | 2026-04-15 | 5.7 Medium |
| APM server logs could contain parts of the document body from a partially failed bulk index request. Depending on the nature of the document, this could disclose sensitive information in APM Server error logs. | ||||
| CVE-2025-7426 | 1 Minova | 1 Tta | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Information disclosure and exposure of authentication FTP credentials over the debug port 1604 in the MINOVA TTA service. This allows unauthenticated remote access to an active FTP account containing sensitive internal data and import structures. In environments where this FTP server is part of automated business processes (e.g. EDI or data integration), this could lead to data manipulation, extraction, or abuse. Debug ports 1602, 1603 and 1636 also expose service architecture information and system activity logs | ||||
| CVE-2025-11203 | 1 Litellm | 1 Litellm | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| LiteLLM Information health API_KEY Information Disclosure Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of LiteLLM. Authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the API_KEY parameter provided to the health endpoint. The issue results from exposing sensitive information to an unauthorized actor. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to disclose stored credentials, leading to further compromise. Was ZDI-CAN-26585. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12896 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability was found in Intelbras VIP S3020 G2, VIP S4020 G2, VIP S4020 G3 and VIP S4320 G2 up to 20241222 and classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /web_caps/webCapsConfig of the component Web Interface. The manipulation leads to information disclosure. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor assesses that "the information disclosed in the URL is not sensitive or poses any risk to the user". | ||||