Export limit exceeded: 415585 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (3952 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-7291 | 1 Crocoblock | 1 Jetelements | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High |
| The JetFormBuilder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to privilege escalation in all versions up to, and including, 3.3.4.1. This is due to improper restriction on user meta fields. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level and above permissions, to register as super-admins on the sites configured as multi-sites. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0834 | 1 Wondershare | 1 Dr.fone | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High |
| Privilege escalation vulnerability has been found in Wondershare Dr.Fone version 13.5.21. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to escalate privileges by replacing the binary ‘C:\ProgramData\Wondershare\wsServices\ElevationService.exe’ with a malicious binary. This binary will be executed by SYSTEM automatically. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0893 | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High | ||
| Symantec Diagnostic Tool (SymDiag), prior to 3.0.79, may be susceptible to a Privilege Escalation vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-11923 | 2 Lifterlms, Wordpress | 2 Lifterlms, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| The LifterLMS – WP LMS for eLearning, Online Courses, & Quizzes plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to privilege escalation. This is due to the plugin not properly validating a user's identity prior to allowing them to modify their own role via the REST API. The permission check in the update_item_permissions_check() function returns true when a user updates their own account without verifying the role changes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with student-level access and above, to escalate their privileges to administrator by updating their own roles array via a crafted REST API request. Another endpoint intended for instructors also provides an attack vector. Affected version ranges are 3.5.3-3.41.2, 4.0.0-4.21.3, 5.0.0-5.10.0, 6.0.0-6.11.0, 7.0.0-7.8.7, 8.0.0-8.0.7, 9.0.0-9.0.7, 9.1.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12952 | 1 Google | 1 Cloud Dialogflow Cx | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in Google Cloud's Dialogflow CX. Dialogflow agent developers with Webhook editor permission are able to configure Webhooks using Dialogflow service agent access token authentication. This allows the attacker to escalate their privileges from agent-level to project-level, granting them unauthorized access to manage resources in services associated with the project, leading to unexpected costs and resource depletion for the producer project. A fix was applied on the server side to protect from this vulnerability in February 2025. No customer action is required. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13176 | 1 Eset | 1 Inspect Connector | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Planting a custom configuration file in ESET Inspect Connector allow load a malicious DLL. | ||||
| CVE-2025-26396 | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High | ||
| The SolarWinds Dameware Mini Remote Control was determined to be affected by Incorrect Permissions Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability. This vulnerability requires local access and a valid low privilege account to be susceptible to this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-26707 | 1 Zte | 1 Goldendb | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in ZTE GoldenDB allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects GoldenDB: from 6.1.03 through 6.1.03.05. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27846 | 1 Espec | 1 North America Web Controller | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| In ESPEC North America Web Controller 3 before 3.3.8, an attacker with physical access can gain elevated privileges because GRUB and the BIOS are unprotected. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27847 | 1 Espec | 1 North America Web Controller | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| In ESPEC North America Web Controller 3 before 3.3.8, /api/v4/auth/ users session privileges are not revoked on logout. | ||||
| CVE-2025-29999 | 2026-04-15 | 6.7 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in Siemens License Server (SLS) (All versions < V4.3). The affected application searches for executable files in the application folder without proper validation. This could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code with administrative privileges by placing a malicious executable in the same directory. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4681 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in upKeeper Solutions upKeeper Instant Privilege Access allows Privilege Abuse.This issue affects upKeeper Instant Privilege Access: before 1.4.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-50124 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| A CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management vulnerability exists that could cause privilege escalation when the server is accessed by a privileged account via a console and through exploitation of a setup script. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53913 | 1 Calix | 1 Gigacenter Ont | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Excessive Privileges vulnerability in Calix GigaCenter ONT (Quantenna SoC modules) allows Privilege Abuse.This issue affects GigaCenter ONT: 844E, 844G, 844GE, 854GE, 812G, 813G, 818G. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53914 | 1 Calix | 1 Gigacenter Ont | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Excessive Privileges vulnerability in Calix GigaCenter ONT (Broadcom SoC modules) allows Privilege Abuse.This issue affects GigaCenter ONT: 844E, 844G, 844GE, 854GE, 812G, 813G, 818G. | ||||
| CVE-2025-5491 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| Acer ControlCenter contains Remote Code Execution vulnerability. The program exposes a Windows Named Pipe that uses a custom protocol to invoke internal functions. However, this Named Pipe is misconfigured, allowing remote users with low privileges to interact with it and access its features. One such feature enables the execution of arbitrary programs as NT AUTHORITY/SYSTEM. By leveraging this, remote attackers can execute arbitrary code on the target system with elevated privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2025-57840 | 1 Honor | 1 Magicos | 2026-04-15 | 2.2 Low |
| ADB(Android Debug Bridge) is affected by type privilege bypass, successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect service availability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6182 | 2 Microsoft, Strongdm | 2 Windows, Sdm-cli | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| The StrongDM Windows service incorrectly handled communication related to system certificate management. Attackers could exploit this behavior to install untrusted root certificates or remove trusted ones. | ||||
| CVE-2025-66314 | 1 Zte | 1 Elasticnet Ume R32 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in ZTE ElasticNet UME R32 on Linux allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects ElasticNet UME R32: ElasticNet_UME_R32_V16.23.20.04. | ||||
| CVE-2025-69257 | 2026-04-15 | 6.7 Medium | ||
| theshit is a command-line utility that automatically detects and fixes common mistakes in shell commands. Prior to version 0.1.1, the application loads custom Python rules and configuration files from user-writable locations (e.g., `~/.config/theshit/`) without validating ownership or permissions when executed with elevated privileges. If the tool is invoked with `sudo` or otherwise runs with an effective UID of root, it continues to trust configuration files originating from the unprivileged user's environment. This allows a local attacker to inject arbitrary Python code via a malicious rule or configuration file, which is then executed with root privileges. Any system where this tool is executed with elevated privileges is affected. In environments where the tool is permitted to run via `sudo` without a password (`NOPASSWD`), a local unprivileged user can escalate privileges to root without additional interaction. The issue has been fixed in version 0.1.1. The patch introduces strict ownership and permission checks for all configuration files and custom rules. The application now enforces that rules are only loaded if they are owned by the effective user executing the tool. When executed with elevated privileges (`EUID=0`), the application refuses to load any files that are not owned by root or that are writable by non-root users. When executed as a non-root user, it similarly refuses to load rules owned by other users. This prevents both vertical and horizontal privilege escalation via execution of untrusted code. If upgrading is not possible, users should avoid executing the application with `sudo` or as the root user. As a temporary mitigation, ensure that directories containing custom rules and configuration files are owned by root and are not writable by non-root users. Administrators may also audit existing custom rules before running the tool with elevated privileges. | ||||