Export limit exceeded: 414173 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (3109 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-38807 | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium | ||
| Applications that use spring-boot-loader or spring-boot-loader-classic and contain custom code that performs signature verification of nested jar files may be vulnerable to signature forgery where content that appears to have been signed by one signer has, in fact, been signed by another. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48393 | 1 Eaton | 1 G4 Pdu | 2026-04-15 | 5.7 Medium |
| The server identity check mechanism for firmware upgrade performed via command shell is insecurely implemented potentially allowing an attacker to perform a Man-in-the-middle attack. This security issue has been fixed in the latest firmware version of Eaton G4 PDU which is available on the Eaton download center. | ||||
| CVE-2025-56449 | 1 Obsidian Scheduler | 1 Rest Api | 2026-04-15 | 8.2 High |
| A security vulnerability was identified in Obsidian Scheduler's REST API 5.0.0 thru 6.3.0. If an account is locked out due to not enrolling in MFA (e.g. after the 7-day enforcement window), the REST API still allows the use of Basic Authentication to authenticate and perform administrative actions. In particular, the default admin account was found to be locked out via the web interface but still usable through the REST API. This allowed creation of a new privileged user, bypassing MFA protections. This undermines the intended security posture of MFA enforcement. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37311 | 2026-04-15 | 8.2 High | ||
| Collabora Online is a collaborative online office suite based on LibreOffice. In affected versions of Collabora Online, https connections from coolwsd to other hosts may incompletely verify the remote host's certificate's against the full chain of trust. This vulnerability is fixed in Collabora Online 24.04.4.3, 23.05.14.1, and 22.05.23.1. | ||||
| CVE-2024-31955 | 2026-04-15 | 4.9 Medium | ||
| An issue was discovered in Samsung eMMC with KLMAG2GE4A and KLM8G1WEMB firmware. Code bypass through Electromagnetic Fault Injection allows an attacker to successfully authenticate and write to the RPMB (Replay Protected Memory Block) area without possessing secret information. | ||||
| CVE-2024-30480 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 3.7 Low |
| Authentication Bypass by Spoofing vulnerability in Pippin Williamson CGC Maintenance Mode allows Functionality Bypass.This issue affects CGC Maintenance Mode: from n/a through 1.2. | ||||
| CVE-2024-30479 | 1 Lionscripts | 1 Ip Blocker Lite | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| Authentication Bypass by Spoofing vulnerability in LionScripts IP Blocker Lite allows Functionality Bypass.This issue affects IP Blocker Lite: from n/a through 11.1.1. | ||||
| CVE-2024-30191 | 2026-04-15 | 8.4 High | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE W1748-1 M12 (6GK5748-1GY01-0AA0), SCALANCE W1748-1 M12 (6GK5748-1GY01-0TA0), SCALANCE W1788-1 M12 (6GK5788-1GY01-0AA0), SCALANCE W1788-2 EEC M12 (6GK5788-2GY01-0TA0), SCALANCE W1788-2 M12 (6GK5788-2GY01-0AA0), SCALANCE W1788-2IA M12 (6GK5788-2HY01-0AA0), SCALANCE W721-1 RJ45 (6GK5721-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W721-1 RJ45 (6GK5721-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W722-1 RJ45 (6GK5722-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W722-1 RJ45 (6GK5722-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W722-1 RJ45 (6GK5722-1FC00-0AC0), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (6GK5734-1FX00-0AA0), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (6GK5734-1FX00-0AA6), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (6GK5734-1FX00-0AB0), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (USA) (6GK5734-1FX00-0AB6), SCALANCE W738-1 M12 (6GK5738-1GY00-0AA0), SCALANCE W738-1 M12 (6GK5738-1GY00-0AB0), SCALANCE W748-1 M12 (6GK5748-1GD00-0AA0), SCALANCE W748-1 M12 (6GK5748-1GD00-0AB0), SCALANCE W748-1 RJ45 (6GK5748-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W748-1 RJ45 (6GK5748-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W761-1 RJ45 (6GK5761-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W761-1 RJ45 (6GK5761-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W774-1 M12 EEC (6GK5774-1FY00-0TA0), SCALANCE W774-1 M12 EEC (6GK5774-1FY00-0TB0), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AA0), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AA6), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AB0), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AC0), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (USA) (6GK5774-1FX00-0AB6), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 (6GK5778-1GY00-0AA0), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 (6GK5778-1GY00-0AB0), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 EEC (6GK5778-1GY00-0TA0), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 EEC (USA) (6GK5778-1GY00-0TB0), SCALANCE W786-1 RJ45 (6GK5786-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W786-1 RJ45 (6GK5786-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W786-2 RJ45 (6GK5786-2FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W786-2 RJ45 (6GK5786-2FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W786-2 RJ45 (6GK5786-2FC00-0AC0), SCALANCE W786-2 SFP (6GK5786-2FE00-0AA0), SCALANCE W786-2 SFP (6GK5786-2FE00-0AB0), SCALANCE W786-2IA RJ45 (6GK5786-2HC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W786-2IA RJ45 (6GK5786-2HC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W788-1 M12 (6GK5788-1GD00-0AA0), SCALANCE W788-1 M12 (6GK5788-1GD00-0AB0), SCALANCE W788-1 RJ45 (6GK5788-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W788-1 RJ45 (6GK5788-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 (6GK5788-2GD00-0AA0), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 (6GK5788-2GD00-0AB0), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 EEC (6GK5788-2GD00-0TA0), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 EEC (6GK5788-2GD00-0TB0), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 EEC (6GK5788-2GD00-0TC0), SCALANCE W788-2 RJ45 (6GK5788-2FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W788-2 RJ45 (6GK5788-2FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W788-2 RJ45 (6GK5788-2FC00-0AC0), SCALANCE WAM763-1 (6GK5763-1AL00-7DA0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 (EU) (6GK5766-1GE00-7DA0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 (US) (6GK5766-1GE00-7DB0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 EEC (EU) (6GK5766-1GE00-7TA0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 EEC (US) (6GK5766-1GE00-7TB0), SCALANCE WUM763-1 (6GK5763-1AL00-3AA0), SCALANCE WUM763-1 (6GK5763-1AL00-3DA0), SCALANCE WUM766-1 (EU) (6GK5766-1GE00-3DA0), SCALANCE WUM766-1 (US) (6GK5766-1GE00-3DB0). This CVE refers to Scenario 3 "Override client’s security context" of CVE-2022-47522. Affected devices can be tricked into associating a newly negotiated, attacker-controlled, security context with frames belonging to a victim. This could allow a physically proximate attacker to decrypt frames meant for the victim. | ||||
| CVE-2024-30190 | 1 Siemens | 9 Scalance W1748-1 M12, Scalance W1788-1 M12, Scalance W1788-2 Eec M12 and 6 more | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE W1748-1 M12 (6GK5748-1GY01-0AA0), SCALANCE W1748-1 M12 (6GK5748-1GY01-0TA0), SCALANCE W1788-1 M12 (6GK5788-1GY01-0AA0), SCALANCE W1788-2 EEC M12 (6GK5788-2GY01-0TA0), SCALANCE W1788-2 M12 (6GK5788-2GY01-0AA0), SCALANCE W1788-2IA M12 (6GK5788-2HY01-0AA0), SCALANCE W721-1 RJ45 (6GK5721-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W721-1 RJ45 (6GK5721-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W722-1 RJ45 (6GK5722-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W722-1 RJ45 (6GK5722-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W722-1 RJ45 (6GK5722-1FC00-0AC0), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (6GK5734-1FX00-0AA0), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (6GK5734-1FX00-0AA6), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (6GK5734-1FX00-0AB0), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (USA) (6GK5734-1FX00-0AB6), SCALANCE W738-1 M12 (6GK5738-1GY00-0AA0), SCALANCE W738-1 M12 (6GK5738-1GY00-0AB0), SCALANCE W748-1 M12 (6GK5748-1GD00-0AA0), SCALANCE W748-1 M12 (6GK5748-1GD00-0AB0), SCALANCE W748-1 RJ45 (6GK5748-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W748-1 RJ45 (6GK5748-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W761-1 RJ45 (6GK5761-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W761-1 RJ45 (6GK5761-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W774-1 M12 EEC (6GK5774-1FY00-0TA0), SCALANCE W774-1 M12 EEC (6GK5774-1FY00-0TB0), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AA0), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AA6), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AB0), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AC0), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (USA) (6GK5774-1FX00-0AB6), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 (6GK5778-1GY00-0AA0), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 (6GK5778-1GY00-0AB0), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 EEC (6GK5778-1GY00-0TA0), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 EEC (USA) (6GK5778-1GY00-0TB0), SCALANCE W786-1 RJ45 (6GK5786-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W786-1 RJ45 (6GK5786-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W786-2 RJ45 (6GK5786-2FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W786-2 RJ45 (6GK5786-2FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W786-2 RJ45 (6GK5786-2FC00-0AC0), SCALANCE W786-2 SFP (6GK5786-2FE00-0AA0), SCALANCE W786-2 SFP (6GK5786-2FE00-0AB0), SCALANCE W786-2IA RJ45 (6GK5786-2HC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W786-2IA RJ45 (6GK5786-2HC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W788-1 M12 (6GK5788-1GD00-0AA0), SCALANCE W788-1 M12 (6GK5788-1GD00-0AB0), SCALANCE W788-1 RJ45 (6GK5788-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W788-1 RJ45 (6GK5788-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 (6GK5788-2GD00-0AA0), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 (6GK5788-2GD00-0AB0), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 EEC (6GK5788-2GD00-0TA0), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 EEC (6GK5788-2GD00-0TB0), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 EEC (6GK5788-2GD00-0TC0), SCALANCE W788-2 RJ45 (6GK5788-2FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W788-2 RJ45 (6GK5788-2FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W788-2 RJ45 (6GK5788-2FC00-0AC0), SCALANCE WAM763-1 (6GK5763-1AL00-7DA0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 (EU) (6GK5766-1GE00-7DA0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 (US) (6GK5766-1GE00-7DB0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 EEC (EU) (6GK5766-1GE00-7TA0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 EEC (US) (6GK5766-1GE00-7TB0), SCALANCE WUM763-1 (6GK5763-1AL00-3AA0), SCALANCE WUM763-1 (6GK5763-1AL00-3DA0), SCALANCE WUM766-1 (EU) (6GK5766-1GE00-3DA0), SCALANCE WUM766-1 (US) (6GK5766-1GE00-3DB0). This CVE refers to Scenario 2 "Abuse the queue for network disruptions" of CVE-2022-47522. Affected devices can be tricked into enabling its power-saving mechanisms for a victim client. This could allow a physically proximate attacker to execute disconnection and denial-of-service attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2024-30189 | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE W721-1 RJ45 (6GK5721-1FC00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W721-1 RJ45 (6GK5721-1FC00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W722-1 RJ45 (6GK5722-1FC00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W722-1 RJ45 (6GK5722-1FC00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W722-1 RJ45 (6GK5722-1FC00-0AC0) (All versions), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (6GK5734-1FX00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (6GK5734-1FX00-0AA6) (All versions), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (6GK5734-1FX00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (USA) (6GK5734-1FX00-0AB6) (All versions), SCALANCE W738-1 M12 (6GK5738-1GY00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W738-1 M12 (6GK5738-1GY00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W748-1 M12 (6GK5748-1GD00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W748-1 M12 (6GK5748-1GD00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W748-1 RJ45 (6GK5748-1FC00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W748-1 RJ45 (6GK5748-1FC00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W761-1 RJ45 (6GK5761-1FC00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W761-1 RJ45 (6GK5761-1FC00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W774-1 M12 EEC (6GK5774-1FY00-0TA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W774-1 M12 EEC (6GK5774-1FY00-0TB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AA6) (All versions), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AC0) (All versions), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (USA) (6GK5774-1FX00-0AB6) (All versions), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 (6GK5778-1GY00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 (6GK5778-1GY00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 EEC (6GK5778-1GY00-0TA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 EEC (USA) (6GK5778-1GY00-0TB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W786-1 RJ45 (6GK5786-1FC00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W786-1 RJ45 (6GK5786-1FC00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W786-2 RJ45 (6GK5786-2FC00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W786-2 RJ45 (6GK5786-2FC00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W786-2 RJ45 (6GK5786-2FC00-0AC0) (All versions), SCALANCE W786-2 SFP (6GK5786-2FE00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W786-2 SFP (6GK5786-2FE00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W786-2IA RJ45 (6GK5786-2HC00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W786-2IA RJ45 (6GK5786-2HC00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-1 M12 (6GK5788-1GD00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-1 M12 (6GK5788-1GD00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-1 RJ45 (6GK5788-1FC00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-1 RJ45 (6GK5788-1FC00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 (6GK5788-2GD00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 (6GK5788-2GD00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 EEC (6GK5788-2GD00-0TA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 EEC (6GK5788-2GD00-0TB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 EEC (6GK5788-2GD00-0TC0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-2 RJ45 (6GK5788-2FC00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-2 RJ45 (6GK5788-2FC00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-2 RJ45 (6GK5788-2FC00-0AC0) (All versions). This CVE refers to Scenario 1 "Leak frames from the Wi-Fi queue" of CVE-2022-47522. Affected devices queue frames in order to subsequently change the security context and leak the queued frames. This could allow a physically proximate attacker to intercept (possibly cleartext) target-destined frames. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0309 | 1 Netskope | 1 Netskope | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| An insufficient validation on the server connection endpoint in Netskope Client allows local users to elevate privileges on the system. The insufficient validation allows Netskope Client to connect to any other server with Public Signed CA TLS certificates and send specially crafted responses to elevate privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2025-61778 | 1 Akkadotnet | 1 Akka.net | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Akka.NET is a .NET port of the Akka project from the Scala / Java community. In all versions of Akka.Remote from v1.2.0 to v1.5.51, TLS could be enabled via our `akka.remote.dot-netty.tcp` transport and this would correctly enforce private key validation on the server-side of inbound connections. Akka.Remote, however, never asked the outbound-connecting client to present ITS certificate - therefore it's possible for untrusted parties to connect to a private key'd Akka.NET cluster and begin communicating with it without any certificate. The issue here is that for certificate-based authentication to work properly, ensuring that all members of the Akka.Remote network are secured with the same private key, Akka.Remote needed to implement mutual TLS. This was not the case before Akka.NET v1.5.52. Those who run Akka.NET inside a private network that they fully control or who were never using TLS in the first place are now affected by the bug. However, those who use TLS to secure their networks must upgrade to Akka.NET V1.5.52 or later. One patch forces "fail fast" semantics if TLS is enabled but the private key is missing or invalid. Previous versions would only check that once connection attempts occurred. The second patch, a critical fix, enforces mutual TLS (mTLS) by default, so both parties must be keyed using the same certificate. As a workaround, avoid exposing the application publicly to avoid the vulnerability having a practical impact on one's application. However, upgrading to version 1.5.52 is still recommended by the maintainers. | ||||
| CVE-2024-25906 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Authentication Bypass by Spoofing vulnerability in WP Happy Coders Comments Like Dislike allows Functionality Bypass.This issue affects Comments Like Dislike: from n/a through 1.2.2. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9265 | 1 Kiloview | 1 Ndi N30 | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A broken authorization vulnerability in Kiloview NDI N30 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to deactivate user verification, giving them access to state changing actions that should only be initiated by administratorsThis issue affects Kiloview NDI N30 and was fixed in Firmware version later than 2.02.0246 | ||||
| CVE-2024-21543 | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High | ||
| Versions of the package djoser before 2.3.0 are vulnerable to Authentication Bypass when the authenticate() function fails. This is because the system falls back to querying the database directly, granting access to users with valid credentials, and eventually bypassing custom authentication checks such as two-factor authentication, LDAP validations, or requirements from configured AUTHENTICATION_BACKENDS. | ||||
| CVE-2024-21542 | 1 Spotify | 1 Luigi | 2026-04-15 | 8.6 High |
| Versions of the package luigi before 3.6.0 are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Write via Archive Extraction (Zip Slip) due to improper destination file path validation in the _extract_packages_archive function. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13990 | 1 Microworld Technologies | 1 Escan | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| MicroWorld eScan AV's update mechanism failed to ensure authenticity and integrity of updates: update packages were delivered and accepted without robust cryptographic verification. As a result, an on-path attacker could perform a man-in-the-middle (MitM) attack and substitute malicious update payloads for legitimate ones. The eScan AV client accepted these substituted packages and executed or loaded their components (including sideloaded DLLs and Java/installer payloads), enabling remote code execution on affected systems. MicroWorld eScan confirmed remediation of the update mechanism on 2023-07-31 but versioning details are unavailable. NOTE: MicroWorld eScan disputes the characterization in third-party reports, stating the issue relates to 2018–2019 and that controls were implemented then. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13956 | 1 Abb | 3 Aspect Enterprise, Matrix Series, Nexus Series | 2026-04-15 | 6.7 Medium |
| SSL Verification Bypass vulnerabilities exist in ASPECT if administrator credentials become compromisedThis issue affects ASPECT-Enterprise: through 3.*; NEXUS Series: through 3.*; MATRIX Series: through 3.*. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12839 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| The login mechanism via device authentication of CGFIDO from Changing Information Technology has an Authentication Bypass vulnerability. If a user visits a forged website, the agent program deployed on their device will send an authentication signature to the website. An unauthenticated remote attacker who obtains this signature can use it to log into the system with any device. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12797 | 1 Redhat | 5 Discovery, Enterprise Linux, Logging and 2 more | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium |
| Issue summary: Clients using RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) to authenticate a server may fail to notice that the server was not authenticated, because handshakes don't abort as expected when the SSL_VERIFY_PEER verification mode is set. Impact summary: TLS and DTLS connections using raw public keys may be vulnerable to man-in-middle attacks when server authentication failure is not detected by clients. RPKs are disabled by default in both TLS clients and TLS servers. The issue only arises when TLS clients explicitly enable RPK use by the server, and the server, likewise, enables sending of an RPK instead of an X.509 certificate chain. The affected clients are those that then rely on the handshake to fail when the server's RPK fails to match one of the expected public keys, by setting the verification mode to SSL_VERIFY_PEER. Clients that enable server-side raw public keys can still find out that raw public key verification failed by calling SSL_get_verify_result(), and those that do, and take appropriate action, are not affected. This issue was introduced in the initial implementation of RPK support in OpenSSL 3.2. The FIPS modules in 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. | ||||