| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| A Missing Authorization vulnerability has been found in DinoRANK. This
vulnerability allows an attacker to access invoices of any user via
accessing endpoint '/facturas/YYYY-MM/SDRYYMM-XXXXX.pdf' because there
is no access control. The pdf filename can be obtained via OSINT,
insecure network traffic or brute force. |
| Registry Access Management (RAM) is a security feature allowing administrators to restrict access for their developers to only allowed registries. When a MacOS configuration profile is used to enforce organization sign-in, the RAM policies are not being applied, which would allow Docker Desktop users to pull down unapproved, and potentially malicious images from any registry. |
| Inadequate access control vulnerability in Davantis DDFUSION v6.177.7, which allows unauthorised actors to retrieve perspective parameters from security camera settings by accessing “/cameras/<CAMERA_ID>/perspective”. |
| SAP S4CORE (Manage journal entries) does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user resulting in escalation of privileges. This has low impact on confidentiality of the application with no impact on integrity and availability of the application. |
| SAP HCM My Timesheet Fiori 2.0 application does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. This issue has a significant impact on the application's integrity, while confidentiality and availability remain unaffected. |
| Due to missing authorization checks, SAP HCM My Timesheet Fiori 2.0 application allows an authenticated attacker with in-depth system knowledge to escalate privileges and perform activities that are otherwise restricted, resulting in a low impact on the integrity of the application. Confidentiality and availability are not impacted. |
| Fiori app Manage Payment Blocks does not perform the necessary authorization checks, allowing an attacker with basic user privileges to abuse functionalities that should be restricted to specific user groups.This issue could impact both the confidentiality and integrity of the application without affecting the availability. |
| SAP HCM Approve Timesheets Fiori 2.0 application does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. This issue has a significant impact on the application's integrity, while confidentiality and availability remain unaffected. |
| Due to a missing authorization check in the ABAP Platform, an authenticated user with elevated privileges could bypass authorization restrictions for common transactions by leveraging the SQL Console. This could enable an attacker to access and read the contents of database tables without proper authorization, leading to a significant compromise of data confidentiality. However, the integrity and availability of the system remain unaffected. |
| SAP Business Warehouse and SAP Plug-In Basis allows an authenticated attacker to add fields to arbitrary SAP database tables and/or structures, potentially rendering the system unusable. On successful exploitation, an attacker can render the system unusable by triggering short dumps on login. This could cause a high impact on availability. Data confidentiality and integrity are not affected. No data can be read, changed or deleted. |
| SAP Netweaver System Configuration does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. This could completely compromise the integrity and availability with no impact on confidentiality of the system. |
| Due to a missing authorization check in SAP Cloud Connector, an attacker on an adjacent network with low privileges could send a crafted request to the endpoint responsible for testing LDAP connections. A successful exploit could lead to reduced performance, hence a low-impact on availability of the service. Confidentiality and integrity of the data are not affected. |
| SAP Business Warehouse and SAP BW/4HANA BEx Tools allow an authenticated attacker to gain higher access levels than intended by exploiting improper authorization checks. This could potentially impact data integrity by allowing deletion of user table entries.�It has no impact on the confidentiality and availability of the application. |
| Due to a missing authorization check in SAP NetWeaver Application server for ABAP, an authenticated user with high privileges could exploit the insufficient validation of user permissions to access sensitive database tables. By leveraging overly permissive access configurations, unauthorized reading of critical data is possible, resulting in a significant impact on the confidentiality of the information stored. However, the integrity and availability of the system remain unaffected. |
| Due to missing authorization check, an attacker authenticated as a non-administrative user could call a remote-enabled function module. This could enable access to information normally restricted, resulting in low impact on confidentiality. There is no impact on integrity or availability. |
| SAP GRC allows a non-administrative user to access and initiate transaction which could allow them to modify or control the transmitted system credentials. This causes high impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability of the application. |
| SAP Business Warehouse and SAP Plug-In Basis allows an authenticated attacker to drop arbitrary SAP database tables, potentially resulting in a loss of data or rendering the system unusable. On successful exploitation, an attacker can completely delete database entries but is not able to read any data. |
| SAP S/4HANA Manage Central Purchase Contract does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user. Due to this, an attacker could execute the function import on the entity making it inaccessible for unrestricted user. This has low impact on confidentiality and availability of the application. |
| SAP Manage Processing Rules (For Bank Statement) allows an attacker with basic privileges to edit shared rules of any user by tampering the request parameter. Due to missing authorization check, the attacker can edit rules that should be restricted, compromising the integrity of the application. |
| RFC inbound processing�does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. On successful exploitation the attacker could critically impact both integrity and availability of the application. |
