| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the (1) Data Stewardship, (2) Business Admin, and (3) Product interfaces in IBM InfoSphere Master Data Management (MDM) Server 8.5 before 8.5.0.82, 9.0.1 before 9.0.1.38, 9.0.2 before 9.0.2.35, 10.0 before 10.0.0.0.26, and 10.1 before 10.1.0.0.15 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Admin Web UI in IBM Lotus Protector for Mail Security 2.8.x before 2.8.1-22905 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Profiles component in IBM Connections through 3.0.1.1 CR3 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that trigger follow actions. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM InfoSphere Information Server Metadata Workbench 8.1 through 9.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the RES Console in Rule Execution Server in IBM Operational Decision Manager 7.5 before FP3 IF37, 8.0 before MP1 FP2, and 8.5 before MP1 IF26 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert XSS sequences. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Tivoli Identity Manager (ITIM) 5.0 before 5.0.0.15 and 5.1 before 5.1.0.15 and IBM Security Identity Manager (ISIM) 6.0 before 6.0.0.2 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert XSS sequences. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the GDS component in IBM InfoSphere Master Data Management - Collaborative Edition 10.x and 11.x before 11.0-FP5 and InfoSphere Master Data Management Server for Product Information Management 9.x through 11.x before 11.3-IF2 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the SEO Plugin LiveOptim plugin before 1.1.4-free for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change plugin settings via unspecified vectors. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in PHPJabbers Appointment Scheduler 2.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the i18n[1][name] parameter in a pjActionCreate action to the pjAdminServices controller or (2) add an administrator via a pjActionCreate action to the pjAdminUsers controller. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in index.php/user_data/insert_user in Savsoft Quiz allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create an administrator account via a crafted request. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in TopAccess (aka the web-based management utility) on TOSHIBA TEC e-Studio 232, 233, 282, and 283 devices allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change passwords. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Quick Page/Post Redirect plugin before 5.0.5 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the quickppr_redirects[request][] parameter in the redirect-updates page to wp-admin/admin.php. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the server in HP Service Manager (SM) 7.21 and 9.x before 9.34 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP System Management Homepage (SMH) before 7.4 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the admin UI in Papercut MF and NG before 14.1 (Build 26983) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the GD Star Rating plugin 19.22 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that conduct (1) SQL injection attacks via the s parameter in the gd-star-rating-stats page to wp-admin/admin.php or (2) cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via unspecified vectors. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in D-Link DAP 1150 with firmware 1.2.94 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) enable or (2) disable the DMZ in the Firewall/DMZ section via a request to index.cgi or (3) add, (4) modify, or (5) delete URL-filter settings in the Control/URL-filter section via a request to index.cgi, as demonstrated by adding a rule that blocks access to google.com. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in goform/RgDdns in ARRIS (formerly Motorola) SBG901 SURFboard Wireless Cable Modem allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change the dns service via the DdnsService parameter, (2) change the username via the DdnsUserName parameter, (3) change the password via the DdnsPassword parameter, or (4) change the host name via the DdnsHostName parameter. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Beetel 450TC2 Router with firmware TX6-0Q-005_retail allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change the administrator password via the uiViewTools_Password and uiViewTools_PasswordConfirm parameters to Forms/tools_admin_1. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in ownCloud Server before 6.0.3 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that (1) conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, (2) modify files, or (3) rename files via unspecified vectors. |