| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The Backup Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.6 via deserialization of untrusted input in the 'recursive_unserialize_replace' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject a PHP Object. The additional presence of a POP chain allows attackers to delete arbitrary files, retrieve sensitive data, or execute code. An administrator must create a staging site in order to trigger the exploit. |
| The Clone plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in all versions up to, and including, 2.4.6 via deserialization of untrusted input in the 'recursive_unserialized_replace' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject a PHP Object. No known POP chain is present in the vulnerable software. If a POP chain is present via an additional plugin or theme installed on the target system, it could allow the attacker to delete arbitrary files, retrieve sensitive data, or execute code. |
| The Advanced File Manager Shortcodes plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Directory Traversal in all versions up to, and including, 2.4. This makes it possible for attackers with contributor access or higher to read the contents of arbitrary files on the server, which can contain sensitive information. |
| Information exposure in the logging system in Yugabyte Platform allows local attackers with access to application logs to obtain database user credentials in log files, potentially leading to unauthorized database access. |
| A weak password requirement issue was discovered in Teldats Router RS123, RS123w allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges |
| Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File vulnerability in Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform VP9500, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G1000, G1500, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F1500, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform 5100, 5500, 5100H, 5500H, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform 5200, 5600, 5200H, 5600H, Hitachi Unified Storage VM, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G100, G200, G400, G600, G800, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F400, F600, F800, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G130, G150, G350, G370, G700, G900, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F350, F370, F700, F900, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform E390, E590, E790, E990, E1090, E390H, E590H, E790H, E1090H allows
local users to gain sensitive information.This issue affects Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform: before DKCMAIN Ver. 70-06-74-00/00, SVP Ver. 70-06-58/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform VP9500: before DKCMAIN Ver. 70-06-74-00/00, SVP Ver. 70-06-58/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G1000, G1500: before DKCMAIN Ver. 80-06-92-00/00, SVP Ver. 80-06-87/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F1500: before DKCMAIN Ver. 80-06-92-00/00, SVP Ver. 80-06-87/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform 5100, 5500,5100H, 5500H: before DKCMAIN Ver. 90-08-81-00/00, SVP Ver. 90-08-81/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 90-08-62-00/00, SVP Ver. 90-08-62/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 90-08-43-00/00, SVP Ver. 90-08-43/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform 5200, 5600,5200H, 5600H: before DKCMAIN Ver. 90-08-81-00/00, SVP Ver. 90-08-81/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 90-08-62-00/00, SVP Ver. 90-08-62/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 90-08-43-00/00, SVP Ver. 90-08-43/00; Hitachi Unified Storage VM: before DKCMAIN Ver. 73-03-75-X0/00, SVP Ver. 73-03-74/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 73(75)-03-75-X0/00, SVP Ver. 73(75)-03-74/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G100, G200, G400, G600, G800: before DKCMAIN Ver. 83-06-19-X0/00, SVP Ver. 83-06-20-X0/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 83-05-47-X0/00, SVP Ver. 83-05-51-X0/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F400, F600, F800: before DKCMAIN Ver. 83-06-19-X0/00, SVP Ver. 83-06-20-X0/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 83-05-47-X0/00, SVP Ver. 83-05-51-X0/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G130, G150, G350, G370, G700, G900: before DKCMAIN Ver. 88-08-09-XX/00, SVP Ver. 88-08-11-X0/02; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F350, F370, F700, F900: before DKCMAIN Ver. 88-08-09-XX/00, SVP Ver. 88-08-11-X0/02; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform E390, E590, E790, E990, E1090, E390H, E590H, E790H, E1090H: before DKCMAIN Ver. 93-06-81-X0/00, SVP Ver. 93-06-81-X0/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 93-06-62-X0/00, SVP Ver. 93-06-62-X0/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 93-06-43-X0/00, SVP Ver. 93-06-43-X0/00.
|
| Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following') vulnerability in yrutschle sslh.This issue affects sslh: before 2.2.2. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC STEP 7 Safety V18 (All versions < V18 Update 2). Affected applications do not properly restrict the .NET BinaryFormatter when deserializing user-controllable input. This could allow an attacker to cause a type confusion and execute arbitrary code within the affected application.
This is the same issue that exists for .NET BinaryFormatter https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/visualstudio/code-quality/ca2300. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V16 (All versions), SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17 (All versions), SIMATIC STEP 7 Safety V16 (All versions), SIMATIC STEP 7 Safety V17 (All versions < V17 Update 8), SIMATIC STEP 7 Safety V18 (All versions < V18 Update 5), SIMATIC STEP 7 V16 (All versions), SIMATIC STEP 7 V17 (All versions < V17 Update 8), SIMATIC STEP 7 V18 (All versions < V18 Update 5), SIMATIC WinCC Unified V16 (All versions), SIMATIC WinCC Unified V17 (All versions < V17 Update 8), SIMATIC WinCC Unified V18 (All versions < V18 SP5), SIMATIC WinCC V16 (All versions), SIMATIC WinCC V17 (All versions < V17 Update 8), SIMATIC WinCC V18 (All versions < V18 SP5), SIMOCODE ES V16 (All versions), SIMOCODE ES V17 (All versions < V17 Update 8), SIMOCODE ES V18 (All versions), SIMOTION SCOUT TIA V5.4 SP1 (All versions), SIMOTION SCOUT TIA V5.4 SP3 (All versions), SIMOTION SCOUT TIA V5.5 SP1 (All versions), SINAMICS Startdrive V16 (All versions), SINAMICS Startdrive V17 (All versions), SINAMICS Startdrive V18 (All versions), SIRIUS Safety ES V17 (TIA Portal) (All versions < V17 Update 8), SIRIUS Safety ES V18 (TIA Portal) (All versions), SIRIUS Soft Starter ES V17 (TIA Portal) (All versions < V17 Update 8), SIRIUS Soft Starter ES V18 (TIA Portal) (All versions), TIA Portal Cloud V16 (All versions), TIA Portal Cloud V17 (All versions < V4.6.0.1), TIA Portal Cloud V18 (All versions < V4.6.1.0). Affected products do not properly sanitize user-controllable input when parsing user settings. This could allow an attacker to cause a type confusion and execute arbitrary code within the affected application. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC STEP 7 Safety V16 (All versions < V16 Update 7), SIMATIC STEP 7 Safety V17 (All versions < V17 Update 7), SIMATIC STEP 7 Safety V18 (All versions < V18 Update 2), SIMATIC STEP 7 V16 (All versions < V16 Update 7), SIMATIC STEP 7 V17 (All versions < V17 Update 7), SIMATIC STEP 7 V18 (All versions < V18 Update 2), SIMATIC WinCC Unified V16 (All versions < V16 Update 7), SIMATIC WinCC Unified V17 (All versions < V17 Update 7), SIMATIC WinCC Unified V18 (All versions < V18 Update 2), SIMATIC WinCC V16 (All versions < V16.7), SIMATIC WinCC V17 (All versions < V17.7), SIMATIC WinCC V18 (All versions < V18 Update 2), SIMOCODE ES V16 (All versions < V16 Update 7), SIMOCODE ES V17 (All versions < V17 Update 7), SIMOCODE ES V18 (All versions < V18 Update 2), SIMOTION SCOUT TIA V5.4 SP1 (All versions), SIMOTION SCOUT TIA V5.4 SP3 (All versions), SIMOTION SCOUT TIA V5.5 SP1 (All versions), SINAMICS Startdrive V16 (All versions), SINAMICS Startdrive V17 (All versions), SINAMICS Startdrive V18 (All versions), SIRIUS Safety ES V17 (All versions < V17 Update 7), SIRIUS Safety ES V18 (All versions < V18 Update 2), SIRIUS Soft Starter ES V17 (All versions < V17 Update 7), SIRIUS Soft Starter ES V18 (All versions < V18 Update 2), Soft Starter ES V16 (All versions < V16 Update 7), TIA Portal Cloud V3.0 (All versions < V18 Update 2). Affected applications do not properly restrict the .NET BinaryFormatter when deserializing hardware configuration profiles. This could allow an attacker to cause a type confusion and execute arbitrary code within the affected application.
This is the same issue that exists for .NET BinaryFormatter https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/visualstudio/code-quality/ca2300. |
| A remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Google Cloud Data Fusion.
A user with permissions to upload artifacts to a Data Fusion instance can execute arbitrary code within the core AppFabric component.
This could allow the attacker to gain control over the Data Fusion instance, potentially leading to unauthorized access to sensitive data, modification of data pipelines, and exploration of the underlying infrastructure.
The following CDAP versions include the necessary update to protect against this vulnerability: * 6.10.6+
* 6.11.1+
Users must immediately upgrade to them, or greater ones, available at: https://github.com/cdapio/cdap-build/releases . |
| Fuji Electric FRENIC-Loader 4 is vulnerable to a deserialization of untrusted data when importing a file through a specified window, which may allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code. |
| The Fluent Forms – Customizable Contact Forms, Survey, Quiz, & Conversational Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in versions 5.1.16 to 6.1.1 via deserialization of untrusted input in the parseUserProperties function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to inject a PHP Object. The additional presence of a POP chain allows attackers to read arbitrary files. If allow_url_include is enabled on the server, remote code execution is possible.
While the vendor patched this issue in version 6.1.0, the patch caused a fatal error in the vulnerable code, due to a missing class import, so we consider 6.1.2 to be the most complete and best patched version |
| pac4j is a security framework for Java. `pac4j-core` prior to version 4.0.0 is affected by a Java deserialization vulnerability. The vulnerability affects systems that store externally controlled values in attributes of the `UserProfile` class from pac4j-core. It can be exploited by providing an attribute that contains a serialized Java object with a special prefix `{#sb64}` and Base64 encoding. This issue may lead to Remote Code Execution (RCE) in the worst case. Although a `RestrictedObjectInputStream` is in place, that puts some restriction on what classes can be deserialized, it still allows a broad range of java packages and potentially exploitable with different gadget chains. pac4j versions 4.0.0 and greater are not affected by this issue. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. |
| Shared Access Signature token is not masked in the backup configuration response and is also exposed in the yb_backup logs |
| pdfminer.six before 20251230 contains an insecure deserialization vulnerability in the CMap loading mechanism. The library uses Python pickle to deserialize CMap cache files without validation. An attacker with the ability to place a malicious pickle file in a location accessible to the application can trigger arbitrary code execution or privilege escalation when the file is loaded by a trusted process. This is caused by an incomplete patch to CVE-2025-64512. |
| An issue in Cato Networks' CatoClient for Linux, before version 5.5, allows a local attacker to escalate privileges to root by exploiting improper symbolic link handling. |
| DiskCache (python-diskcache) through 5.6.3 uses Python pickle for serialization by default. An attacker with write access to the cache directory can achieve arbitrary code execution when a victim application reads from the cache. |
| Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in fuelthemes North north-wp allows Object Injection.This issue affects North: from n/a through <= 5.7.5. |
| Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in ThemeREX Sound | Musical Instruments Online Store musicplace allows Object Injection.This issue affects Sound | Musical Instruments Online Store: from n/a through <= 1.6.9. |
